RAMIREZ v. INDIANA, 471 U.S. 147 (1985)
Argued:
March 19, 1985
Decided:
April 1, 1985
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
RAMIREZ v. INDIANA, 471 U.S. 147 (1985) 471 U.S. 147RAMIREZ v. INDIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
No. 84-5059.
Argued March 19, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985
455
N.E.2d 609, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Kenneth F. Ripple, by appointment of the Court, 469 U.S. 1015,
argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David
T. Link, Douglas W. Kenyon, Mollie A. Murphy, and Richard S. Myers.
William E. Daily, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General, and Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
No. 84-5059.
Argued March 19, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985
U.S. Supreme Court
RAMIREZ v. INDIANA, 471 U.S. 147 (1985) 471 U.S. 147 RAMIREZ v. INDIANACERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
No. 84-5059.
Argued March 19, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985
455
N.E.2d 609, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Kenneth F. Ripple, by appointment of the Court, 469 U.S. 1015,
argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David
T. Link, Douglas W. Kenyon, Mollie A. Murphy, and Richard S. Myers.
William E. Daily, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the
cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linley E. Pearson,
Attorney General, and Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney
General.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
Page 471
U.S. 147, 148
Materials
Search This Case
