MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969)
Argued:
December 11, 1968
Decided:
May 26, 1969
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969) 395 U.S. 209MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A.2d 507, appeal dismissed.
Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh.
George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A.2d 507, appeal dismissed. Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh. George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. Page 395 U.S. 209, 210
U.S. Supreme Court
MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969) 395 U.S. 209 MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT.APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A.2d 507, appeal dismissed. Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh. George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. Page 395 U.S. 209, 210
Search This Case
