PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 208 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 208 (1969) 395 U.S. 208PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 39.
Argued November 14, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
65 Cal. 2d 615, 422 P.2d 597, dismissed.
Peter G. Fetros, by appointment of the Court, 393 U.S. 812, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents from the dismissal of the writ.
U.S. Supreme Court
PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 208 (1969) 395 U.S. 208 PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 39.
Argued November 14, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
65 Cal. 2d 615, 422 P.2d 597, dismissed. Peter G. Fetros, by appointment of the Court, 393 U.S. 812, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General. PER CURIAM. The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents from the dismissal of the writ. Page 395 U.S. 208, 209