JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969) 395 U.S. 162JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL
BOARD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1173.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Vacated and remanded.
William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court having been rendered prior to our decision in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, which overruled MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded so that it can be reconsidered in light of the changed circumstances.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1173.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Vacated and remanded. William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court having been rendered prior to our decision in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, which overruled MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded so that it can be reconsidered in light of the changed circumstances. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment. Page 395 U.S. 162, 163
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD, 395 U.S. 162 (1969) 395 U.S. 162 JONES v. ILLINOIS BY ITS ELECTORAL BOARD.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1173.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Vacated and remanded. William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court having been rendered prior to our decision in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, which overruled MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded so that it can be reconsidered in light of the changed circumstances. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment. Page 395 U.S. 162, 163
Search This Case
