NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 849 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 849 (1969) 394 U.S. 849NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., ET AL.
v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 1169.
Decided May 5, 1969.
293 F. Supp. 630, affirmed.
William J. Lippman, Robert Joyner, and Roland Rice for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William P. Sullivan and William P. Jackson, Jr., for appellee Contract Carrier Conference of American Trucking Assns., Inc.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 1169.
Decided May 5, 1969.
293 F. Supp. 630, affirmed. William J. Lippman, Robert Joyner, and Roland Rice for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William P. Sullivan and William P. Jackson, Jr., for appellee Contract Carrier Conference of American Trucking Assns., Inc. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 394 U.S. 849, 1
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 849 (1969) 394 U.S. 849 NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 1169.
Decided May 5, 1969.
293 F. Supp. 630, affirmed. William J. Lippman, Robert Joyner, and Roland Rice for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William P. Sullivan and William P. Jackson, Jr., for appellee Contract Carrier Conference of American Trucking Assns., Inc. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 394 U.S. 849, 1
Search This Case
