HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 556 ET AL. v. EMERY ET UX.,
DBA MAIN DINER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 988.
Decided April 1, 1969.

281 Minn. 334, 161 N.W.2d 842, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solly Robins, Stanford Robins, J. W. Brown, Benjamin Gettler, and Jonas Katz for appellants.

John S. Connolly for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455

DeLURY ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1029.
Decided April 1, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 175, 243 N.E.2d 128, appeal dismissed.

Paul O'Dwyer, W. Bernard Richland, Morris Weissberg, and John J. DeLury, Jr., for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 455, 456

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UN. LOC. NO. 556 v. EMERY, 394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455 HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 556 ET AL. v. EMERY ET UX.,
DBA MAIN DINER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 988.
Decided April 1, 1969.

281 Minn. 334, 161 N.W.2d 842, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solly Robins, Stanford Robins, J. W. Brown, Benjamin Gettler, and Jonas Katz for appellants.

John S. Connolly for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DeLURY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 394 U.S. 455 (1969) 394 U.S. 455 DeLURY ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1029.
Decided April 1, 1969.

23 N.Y.2d 175, 243 N.E.2d 128, appeal dismissed.

Paul O'Dwyer, W. Bernard Richland, Morris Weissberg, and John J. DeLury, Jr., for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin, Frederic S. Nathan, and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 455, 456