O'CALLAHAN v. PARKER, 393 U.S. 822 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
O'CALLAHAN v. PARKER , 393 U.S. 822 (1968)393 U.S. 822
James F. O'CALLAHAN, petitioner,
v.
J. J. PARKER, Warden.
No. 202, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 14, 1968
Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, for respondent.
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows:
'1. Does a court-martial, held under
the Articles of War, Tit. 10, U. S.C. 801 et seq., have
jurisdiction to try a member of the Armed Forces who is charged
with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and
having no military significance, alleged to have been committed
off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his
constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a
petit jury in a civilian court?'
Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the
summary calendar.[ O'Callahan v. Parker 393 U.S. 822 (1968) ]
Opinions
v.
J. J. PARKER, Warden.
No. 202, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States October 14, 1968 Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin, for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, for respondent. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows:
U.S. Supreme Court
O'CALLAHAN v. PARKER , 393 U.S. 822 (1968) 393 U.S. 822 James F. O'CALLAHAN, petitioner,v.
J. J. PARKER, Warden.
No. 202, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States October 14, 1968 Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin, for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, for respondent. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows:
'1. Does a court-martial, held under
the Articles of War, Tit. 10, U. S.C. 801 et seq., have
jurisdiction to try a member of the Armed Forces who is charged
with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and
having no military significance, alleged to have been committed
off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his
constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a
petit jury in a civilian court?'
Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the
summary calendar.[ O'Callahan v. Parker 393
U.S. 822 (1968) ]
Search This Case
