BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969)

Decided: February 24, 1969
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530

BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA.
No. 883.
Decided February 24, 1969.

151 Mont. 526, 445 P.2d 574, appeal dismissed.

Thomas E. Towe for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530

ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC., ET AL. v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 889.
Decided February 24, 1969.

51 N. J. 107, 237 A.2d 880, appeal dismissed.

Edward B. Meredith for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 530, 531

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA.
No. 883.
Decided February 24, 1969.

151 Mont. 526, 445 P.2d 574, appeal dismissed.

Thomas E. Towe for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.


393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC., ET AL. v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 889.
Decided February 24, 1969.

51 N. J. 107, 237 A.2d 880, appeal dismissed.

Edward B. Meredith for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 530, 531