LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 393 U.S. 481 (1969)
Decided:
January 27, 1969
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 393 U.S. 481 (1969) 393 U.S. 481LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER ET AL. v. CITY
OF ROCHESTER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 799.
Decided January 27, 1969.
22 N.Y.2d 802, 239 N.E.2d 646, appeal dismissed.
Ronald J. Buttarazzi for appellants.
Sterling L. Weaver and Ruth B. Rosenberg for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 799.
Decided January 27, 1969.
22 N.Y.2d 802, 239 N.E.2d 646, appeal dismissed. Ronald J. Buttarazzi for appellants. Sterling L. Weaver and Ruth B. Rosenberg for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 393 U.S. 481, 482
U.S. Supreme Court
LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 393 U.S. 481 (1969) 393 U.S. 481 LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 799.
Decided January 27, 1969.
22 N.Y.2d 802, 239 N.E.2d 646, appeal dismissed. Ronald J. Buttarazzi for appellants. Sterling L. Weaver and Ruth B. Rosenberg for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 393 U.S. 481, 482
Search This Case
