DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969)
Decided:
January 20, 1969
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969) 393 U.S. 409DICKINSON, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 741.
Decided January 20, 1969.
Affirmed.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Fred M. Burns and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.
O. Ralph Matousek for appellee First National Bank of Homestead.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 741.
Decided January 20, 1969.
Affirmed. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Fred M. Burns and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. O. Ralph Matousek for appellee First National Bank of Homestead. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 393 U.S. 409, 410
U.S. Supreme Court
DICKINSON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD, 393 U.S. 409 (1969) 393 U.S. 409 DICKINSON, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 741.
Decided January 20, 1969.
Affirmed. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Fred M. Burns and Larry Levy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. O. Ralph Matousek for appellee First National Bank of Homestead. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 393 U.S. 409, 410
Search This Case
