WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF
PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 706.
Decided January 13, 1969.
430 Pa. 509, 244 A.2d 37, appeal dismissed.
Norman J. Cowie for appellant.
Robert E. Dauer for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 706.
Decided January 13, 1969.
430 Pa. 509, 244 A.2d 37, appeal dismissed. Norman J. Cowie for appellant. Robert E. Dauer for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969) 393 U.S. 319 COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Affirmed. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 393 U.S. 319, 320