STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968)
Decided:
December 16, 1968
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968) 393 U.S. 267STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.
262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed.
Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.'
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.
262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed. Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant. Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.' Page 393 U.S. 267, 268
U.S. Supreme Court
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968) 393 U.S. 267 STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.
262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed. Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant. Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.' Page 393 U.S. 267, 268
Search This Case
