STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968)
Argued:
November 20, 1968
Decided:
December 9, 1968
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968) 393 U.S. 219STILES v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST
CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.
Certiorari dismissed.
Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.
Certiorari dismissed. Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen. PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. Page 393 U.S. 219, 220
U.S. Supreme Court
STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968) 393 U.S. 219 STILES v. UNITED STATES.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.
Certiorari dismissed. Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen. PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. Page 393 U.S. 219, 220
Search This Case
