LEE v. U.S., 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)
Decided:
January 20, 1969
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)393 U.S. 1053
Ardell LEE, etc., et al.,
petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 20, 1969
Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or
decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)
]
Opinions
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782. Supreme Court of the United States January 20, 1969 Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Denied. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) 393 U.S. 1053 Ardell LEE, etc., et al., petitioners,v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782. Supreme Court of the United States January 20, 1969 Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Denied. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]
Search This Case
