CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968) 392 U.S. 659CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Affirmed.
Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Affirmed. Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. Page 392 U.S. 659, 660
U.S. Supreme Court
CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968) 392 U.S. 659 CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Affirmed. Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. Page 392 U.S. 659, 660
Search This Case
