SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968) 390 U.S. 143SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner.
W. Ford Reese for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner. W. Ford Reese for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967). Page 390 U.S. 143, 144
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968) 390 U.S. 143 SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner. W. Ford Reese for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967). Page 390 U.S. 143, 144
Search This Case
