BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967)
Decided:
November 6, 1967
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967) 389 U.S. 88BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL
RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.
279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed.
John H. Gobel for appellants.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.
279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed. John H. Gobel for appellants. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 389 U.S. 88, 89
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967) 389 U.S. 88 BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATESET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.
279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed. John H. Gobel for appellants. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 389 U.S. 88, 89
Search This Case
