PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)

Decided: January 15, 1968
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968) 389 U.S. 583

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.

Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 583, 1

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968) 389 U.S. 583 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.

Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 583, 1