MILLER v. HAINES, 389 U.S. 582 (1968)
Decided:
January 15, 1968
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. HAINES, 389 U.S. 582 (1968) 389 U.S. 582MILLER v. HAINES, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT
OF MENTAL HYGIENE AND
CORRECTION OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 840.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Lopeman for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
CORRECTION OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 840.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Appeal dismissed. Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Lopeman for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 389 U.S. 582, 583
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. HAINES, 389 U.S. 582 (1968) 389 U.S. 582 MILLER v. HAINES, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE ANDCORRECTION OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 840.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Appeal dismissed. Freeman T. Eagleson, Jr., for appellant. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, Winifred A. Dunton, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Lopeman for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 389 U.S. 582, 583
Search This Case
