CANTON POULTRY, INC., v. CONNER, 388 U.S. 458 (1967)
Syllabus
Decided June 12, 1967.
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTON POULTRY, INC., v. CONNER, 388 U.S. 458 (1967) 388 U.S. 458CANTON POULTRY, INC., ET AL. v. CONNER,
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
OF FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 1008, vacated and remanded.
Homer S. Durden, Jr., for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm'n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U.S. 281, 282.
Opinions
OF FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 1315.
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 1008, vacated and remanded. Homer S. Durden, Jr., for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm'n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U.S. 281, 282. Page 388 U.S. 458, 459
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTON POULTRY, INC., v. CONNER, 388 U.S. 458 (1967) 388 U.S. 458 CANTON POULTRY, INC., ET AL. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTUREOF FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 1315.
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 1008, vacated and remanded. Homer S. Durden, Jr., for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm'n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U.S. 281, 282. Page 388 U.S. 458, 459
Search This Case
