ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN v. UNITED STATES, 388 U.S. 455 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN v. UNITED STATES, 388 U.S. 455 (1967) 388 U.S. 455ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND
BRAKEMEN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1093.
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 650, affirmed.
Harry Wilmarth for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1093.
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 650, affirmed. Harry Wilmarth for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. Page 388 U.S. 455, 456
U.S. Supreme Court
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN v. UNITED STATES, 388 U.S. 455 (1967) 388 U.S. 455 ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1093.
Decided June 12, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 650, affirmed. Harry Wilmarth for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. Page 388 U.S. 455, 456
Search This Case
