BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967) 388 U.S. 451BURKARD ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court.
18 N.Y.2d 148, 219 N.E.2d 183, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.
Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808.
Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court. 18 N.Y.2d 148, 219 N.E.2d 183, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied. Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808. Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 388 U.S. 451, 452
U.S. Supreme Court
BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967) 388 U.S. 451 BURKARD ET AL. v. NEW YORK.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court. 18 N.Y.2d 148, 219 N.E.2d 183, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied. Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808. Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 388 U.S. 451, 452
Search This Case
