SKOLNICK v. KERNER, 387 U.S. 91 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SKOLNICK v. KERNER, 387 U.S. 91 (1967) 387 U.S. 91SKOLNICK v. KERNER, GOVERNOR OF
ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1401, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 318, appeal dismissed.
Appellant pro se.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1401, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 318, appeal dismissed. Appellant pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 387 U.S. 91, 92
U.S. Supreme Court
SKOLNICK v. KERNER, 387 U.S. 91 (1967) 387 U.S. 91 SKOLNICK v. KERNER, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1401, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 318, appeal dismissed. Appellant pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 387 U.S. 91, 92
Search This Case
