JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967) 387 U.S. 239JULIAN MESSNER, INC., ET AL. v.
SPAHN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1154.
Decided May 22, 1967.
18 N.Y.2d 324, 221 N.E.2d 543, vacated and remanded.
Selig J. Levitan for appellants.
Arthur K. Radin for appellee.
Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1154.
Decided May 22, 1967.
18 N.Y.2d 324, 221 N.E.2d 543, vacated and remanded. Selig J. Levitan for appellants. Arthur K. Radin for appellee. Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. Page 387 U.S. 239, 240
U.S. Supreme Court
JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967) 387 U.S. 239 JULIAN MESSNER, INC., ET AL. v. SPAHN.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1154.
Decided May 22, 1967.
18 N.Y.2d 324, 221 N.E.2d 543, vacated and remanded. Selig J. Levitan for appellants. Arthur K. Radin for appellee. Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. Page 387 U.S. 239, 240
Search This Case
