PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) 386 U.S. 713PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN ET AL. v.
HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF
MICHIGAN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 1098.
Decided April 24, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
James L. Elsman, Jr., for appellants.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Russell A. Searl, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) 386 U.S. 713 (1967) 386 U.S. 713 386 U.S. 713"> PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN ET AL. v. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OFMICHIGAN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 1098.
Decided April 24, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. James L. Elsman, Jr., for appellants. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Russell A. Searl, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.