DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY., 386 U.S. 683 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) 386 U.S. 683DACEY ET AL. v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF
THE BAR OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1049.
Decided April 17, 1967.
154 Conn. 129, 222 A.2d 339, appeal dismissed.
George A. Saden for appellants.
David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1049.
Decided April 17, 1967.
154 Conn. 129, 222 A.2d 339, appeal dismissed. George A. Saden for appellants. David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 386 U.S. 683, 684
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DACEY v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, BAR, FAIRFIELD COUNTY., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) 386 U.S. 683 (1967) 386 U.S. 683 386 U.S. 683"> DACEY ET AL. v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BAR OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1049.
Decided April 17, 1967.
154 Conn. 129, 222 A.2d 339, appeal dismissed. George A. Saden for appellants. David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 386 U.S. 683, 684
Search This Case
