BEATTIE v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 285 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BEATTIE v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 285 (1967) 386 U.S. 285BEATTIE v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF
CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 556, Misc. Filed March
13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 556, Misc. Filed March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. Page 386 U.S. 285, 286
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BEATTIE v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 285 (1967) 386 U.S. 285 (1967) 386 U.S. 285 386 U.S. 285"> BEATTIE v. CALIFORNIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 556, Misc. Filed March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. Page 386 U.S. 285, 286
Search This Case
