DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967) 386 U.S. 284DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI
PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
MISSOURI.
No. 533, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 416.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 533, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 416. Page 386 U.S. 284, 285
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967) 386 U.S. 284 (1967) 386 U.S. 284 386 U.S. 284"> DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 533, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 416. Page 386 U.S. 284, 285
Search This Case
