SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 277 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 277 (1967) 386 U.S. 277SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF
THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 52,
Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Valerian J. Lavernoich for petitioner.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 52, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Valerian J. Lavernoich for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. Page 386 U.S. 277, 278
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 277 (1967) 386 U.S. 277 (1967) 386 U.S. 277 386 U.S. 277"> SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 52, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Valerian J. Lavernoich for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. Page 386 U.S. 277, 278
Search This Case
