HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO., 385 U.S. 362 (1966)
Argued:
December 8, 1966
Decided:
December 12, 1966
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO., 385 U.S. 362 (1966) 385 U.S. 362HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR
CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 48.
Argued December 8, 1966.
Decided December 12, 1966.
375 Mich. 490, 134 N.W.2d 637, dismissed.
Gregory M. Pillon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas C. Mayer.
Harry M. Plotkin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Carl H. Smith.
PER CURIAM.
The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 48.
Argued December 8, 1966.
Decided December 12, 1966.
375 Mich. 490, 134 N.W.2d 637, dismissed. Gregory M. Pillon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas C. Mayer. Harry M. Plotkin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Carl H. Smith. PER CURIAM. The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted. Page 385 U.S. 362, 363
U.S. Supreme Court
HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO., 385 U.S. 362 (1966) 385 U.S. 362 HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 48.
Argued December 8, 1966.
Decided December 12, 1966.
375 Mich. 490, 134 N.W.2d 637, dismissed. Gregory M. Pillon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas C. Mayer. Harry M. Plotkin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Carl H. Smith. PER CURIAM. The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted. Page 385 U.S. 362, 363
Search This Case
