MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966)
Decided:
June 20, 1966
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966) 384 U.S. 892MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY
SUPERINTENDENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Vacated and remanded.
Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Vacated and remanded. Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940. Page 384 U.S. 892, 893
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966) 384 U.S. 892 MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Vacated and remanded. Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940. Page 384 U.S. 892, 893
Search This Case
