VENABLE v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 266 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
VENABLE v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266VENABLE v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1196.
Decided May 23, 1966.
397 S.W.2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
William VanDercreek for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 991.
Decided May 23, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Ronald H. Bonaparte and David A. Binder for appellant.
Byron B. Gentry for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
VENABLE v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266 VENABLE v. TEXAS.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1196.
Decided May 23, 1966.
397 S.W.2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. William VanDercreek for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 384 U.S. 266, 267
384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266 WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA.APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 991.
Decided May 23, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Ronald H. Bonaparte and David A. Binder for appellant. Byron B. Gentry for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
