UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966) 384 U.S. 212UNITED STATES v. FISHER.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Joseph H. Stamler for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Affirmed. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States. Joseph H. Stamler for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits. Page 384 U.S. 212, 213
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966) 384 U.S. 212 UNITED STATES v. FISHER.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Affirmed. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States. Joseph H. Stamler for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits. Page 384 U.S. 212, 213
Search This Case
