CLAYTON v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 156 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CLAYTON v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 156 (1966) 384 U.S. 156CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF
NORTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 893.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Insurance Co. v. Lucas, 314 U.S. 575; Public Service Comm'n v. Brashear Lines, 306 U.S. 204.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 893.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Insurance Co. v. Lucas, 314 U.S. 575; Public Service Comm'n v. Brashear Lines, 306 U.S. 204. Page 384 U.S. 156, 157
U.S. Supreme Court
CLAYTON v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 156 (1966) 384 U.S. 156 CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 893.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Insurance Co. v. Lucas, 314 U.S. 575; Public Service Comm'n v. Brashear Lines, 306 U.S. 204. Page 384 U.S. 156, 157
Search This Case
