BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154BAER v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Isadore Greenberg for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH
CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Isadore Greenberg for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Page 384 U.S. 154, 155
U.S. Supreme Court
BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154 BAER v. NEW YORK.APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Isadore Greenberg for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154 UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Appeal dismissed. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Page 384 U.S. 154, 155
Search This Case
