KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965)
Decided:
June 7, 1965
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965) 381 U.S. 763KNOWLES v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Petitioner pro se.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent. Page 381 U.S. 763, 1
U.S. Supreme Court
KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965) 381 U.S. 763 KNOWLES v. FLORIDA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 7, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent. Page 381 U.S. 763, 1
Search This Case
