FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965)

Decided: June 7, 1965
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965) 381 U.S. 762

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024.
Decided June 7, 1965.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1025, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 339 F.2d 694.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024.

Herbert E. Squires and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 1025.

J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co., and Federal Power Comm'n v. Marr, ante, p. 392.

Page 381 U.S. 762, 763

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965) 381 U.S. 762 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024.
Decided June 7, 1965.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1025, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 339 F.2d 694.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024.

Herbert E. Squires and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 1025.

J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co., and Federal Power Comm'n v. Marr, ante, p. 392.

Page 381 U.S. 762, 763