U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT INC. v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 450 (1965)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT INC. v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 450 (1965) 380 U.S. 450U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
DELAWARE.
No. 856.
Decided April 5, 1965.
235 F. Supp. 689, affirmed.
Paul F. Sullivan for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 856.
Decided April 5, 1965.
235 F. Supp. 689, affirmed. Paul F. Sullivan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 380 U.S. 450, 451
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT INC. v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 450 (1965) 380 U.S. 450 U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 856.
Decided April 5, 1965.
235 F. Supp. 689, affirmed. Paul F. Sullivan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 380 U.S. 450, 451
Search This Case
