BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260BAKER ET AL., DBA BAKER & FORD v.
ALASKA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided March 15, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 64 Wash. 2d 207, 390 P.2d 1009.
Bruce T. Rinker, Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 397, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.
Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.
Reported below: 333 F.2d 405.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to make findings with respect to petitioner's consent to the search.
U.S. Supreme Court
BAKER v. ALASKA, 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260 BAKER ET AL., DBA BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 849.
Decided March 15, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 64 Wash. 2d 207, 390 P.2d 1009. Bruce T. Rinker, Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellants. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES., 380 U.S. 260 (1965) 380 U.S. 260 MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 397, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.
Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded. Reported below: 333 F.2d 405. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to make findings with respect to petitioner's consent to the search. Page 380 U.S. 260, 261