SEALS v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 254 (1965)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SEALS v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 254 (1965) 380 U.S. 254SEALS v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
ALABAMA.
No. 465, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Reported below: 276 Ala. 654, 165 So. 2d 742.
Vernon Crawford, Morton Stavis, Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler for petitioner.
Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 465, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 276 Ala. 654, 165 So. 2d 742. Vernon Crawford, Morton Stavis, Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler for petitioner. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12. Page 380 U.S. 254, 255
U.S. Supreme Court
SEALS v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 254 (1965) 380 U.S. 254 SEALS v. ALABAMA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 465, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 276 Ala. 654, 165 So. 2d 742. Vernon Crawford, Morton Stavis, Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler for petitioner. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12. Page 380 U.S. 254, 255
Search This Case
