HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250HALL v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 848, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250ARTHUR v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.
Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371.
Edward C. King for petitioner.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2.
U.S. Supreme Court
HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250 HALL v. ILLINOIS.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 848, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 380 U.S. 250, 251
380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250 ARTHUR v. COLORADO.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371. Edward C. King for petitioner. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2.
