DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125DRUEDING ET AL. v. DEVLIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MARYLAND.
No. 772.
Decided March 1, 1965.
234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.
Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET
AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834.
George A. Blackstone for appellants.
Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125 DRUEDING ET AL. v. DEVLIN ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 772.
Decided March 1, 1965.
234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed. Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed. Page 380 U.S. 125, 126
380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125 CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834. George A. Blackstone for appellants. Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
