COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964)
Decided:
June 22, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964) 378 U.S. 588COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1041, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Judgment vacated and case remanded.
Reported below: 226 F. Supp. 20.
Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1041, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Judgment vacated and case remanded. Reported below: 226 F. Supp. 20. Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellant. Solicitor General Cox for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment. Page 378 U.S. 588, 589
U.S. Supreme Court
COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 378 U.S. 588 (1964) 378 U.S. 588 COPELAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1041, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Judgment vacated and case remanded. Reported below: 226 F. Supp. 20. Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellant. Solicitor General Cox for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment. Page 378 U.S. 588, 589
Search This Case
