LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964)
Decided:
June 22, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964) 378 U.S. 555LUCAS ET AL. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE
DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Affirmed.
Releford McGriff for appellants.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Affirmed. Releford McGriff for appellants. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 378 U.S. 555, 556
U.S. Supreme Court
LUCAS v. ADAMS, 378 U.S. 555 (1964) 378 U.S. 555 LUCAS ET AL. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Affirmed. Releford McGriff for appellants. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 378 U.S. 555, 556
Search This Case
