UNITED FUEL GAS v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, WEST VIRGINIA, 376 U.S. 784 (1964)
Decided:
April 6, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED FUEL GAS v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, WEST VIRGINIA, 376 U.S. 784 (1964) 376 U.S. 784UNITED FUEL GAS CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE
COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 527.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Albert R. Connelly, Edward S. Pinney, Victor M. Earle III, C. E. Goodwin, John F. Hunt, Jr., Charles C. Wise, Jr. and William C. Hart for appellant.
Robert L. Stewart for appellee.
Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Frank I. Goodman, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for the United States et al., as amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 527.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Albert R. Connelly, Edward S. Pinney, Victor M. Earle III, C. E. Goodwin, John F. Hunt, Jr., Charles C. Wise, Jr. and William C. Hart for appellant. Robert L. Stewart for appellee. Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Frank I. Goodman, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for the United States et al., as amici curiae. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 376 U.S. 784, 1
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED FUEL GAS v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, WEST VIRGINIA, 376 U.S. 784 (1964) 376 U.S. 784 UNITED FUEL GAS CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 527.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Albert R. Connelly, Edward S. Pinney, Victor M. Earle III, C. E. Goodwin, John F. Hunt, Jr., Charles C. Wise, Jr. and William C. Hart for appellant. Robert L. Stewart for appellee. Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Frank I. Goodman, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for the United States et al., as amici curiae. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 376 U.S. 784, 1
Search This Case
