YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964)
Decided:
April 6, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964) 376 U.S. 783YRIBARNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ET
AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 811.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 218 Cal. App. 2d 369, 32 Cal. Rptr. 847.
Herman F. Selvin for appellant.
John N. Cramer for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 811.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 218 Cal. App. 2d 369, 32 Cal. Rptr. 847. Herman F. Selvin for appellant. John N. Cramer for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 376 U.S. 783, 784
U.S. Supreme Court
YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964) 376 U.S. 783 YRIBARNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 811.
Decided April 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 218 Cal. App. 2d 369, 32 Cal. Rptr. 847. Herman F. Selvin for appellant. John N. Cramer for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 376 U.S. 783, 784
Search This Case
