KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

Decided: March 23, 1964
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512

KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA. No. 753.
Decided March 23, 1964.

216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.

Appellant pro se.

John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 376 U.S. 512, 513

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA. No. 753.
Decided March 23, 1964.
216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.

Appellant pro se.

John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 376 U.S. 512, 513