FIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS CORP. v. N.L.R.B., 375 U.S. 963 (1964)
Decided:
January 6, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS CORP. v. N.L.R.B. , 375 U.S. 963 (1964)375 U.S. 963
FIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS
CORPORATION, petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
No. 610.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 6, 1964
Marion B. Plant and Gerard D. Reilly, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come, for the National Labor Relations Board.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:
'1. Was Petitioner required by the
National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing
some of its employees about whether to let to an independent
contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of
certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?
'3. Was the Board, in a case
involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the
resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate
business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals
formerly employed therein?'
The case is placed on the summary calendar.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or
decision of this petition.[ Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.
N.L.R.B. 375 U.S.
963 (1964) ]
Opinions
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
No. 610. Supreme Court of the United States January 6, 1964 Marion B. Plant and Gerard D. Reilly, for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come, for the National Labor Relations Board. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:
U.S. Supreme Court
FIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS CORP. v. N.L.R.B. , 375 U.S. 963 (1964) 375 U.S. 963 FIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS CORPORATION, petitioner,v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
No. 610. Supreme Court of the United States January 6, 1964 Marion B. Plant and Gerard D. Reilly, for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come, for the National Labor Relations Board. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:
'1. Was Petitioner required by the
National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing
some of its employees about whether to let to an independent
contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of
certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?
'3. Was the Board, in a case
involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the
resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate
business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals
formerly employed therein?'
The case is placed on the summary calendar.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or
decision of this petition.[ Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.
N.L.R.B. 375
U.S. 963 (1964) ]
Search This Case
