LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 375 U.S. 451 (1964)

Decided: January 20, 1964
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451

LANZA ET AL. v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 560.
Decided January 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 39 N. J. 595, 190 A.2d 374.

Jacob Green for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451

ARONOFF ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 639.
Decided January 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 60 Cal. 2d 177, 383 P.2d 409.

Thomas W. LeSage for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 451, 452

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451 LANZA ET AL. v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 560.
Decided January 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 39 N. J. 595, 190 A.2d 374.

Jacob Green for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 451 (1964) 375 U.S. 451 ARONOFF ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 639.
Decided January 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 60 Cal. 2d 177, 383 P.2d 409.

Thomas W. LeSage for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 451, 452