COUNTS v. COUNTS, 373 U.S. 543 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
COUNTS v. COUNTS, 373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543COUNTS v. COUNTS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME
JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 1058, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 358 S.W.2d 192.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, 373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
FLORIDA.
No. 706, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
U.S. Supreme Court
COUNTS v. COUNTS, 373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543 COUNTS v. COUNTS.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 1058, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 358 S.W.2d 192. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 373 U.S. 543, 544
373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, 373 U.S. 543 (1963) 373 U.S. 543 BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 706, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
